Archive

Archive for the ‘POLITICS’ Category

Are we legally Married in Florida?

July 2nd, 2010

We are two older retired guys ( 58 – 64 ) living on our pension and Social Security. We got LEGALLY married as a same sex couple in Vienna on

It is great to be married

 May 17, 2010. This year in Austria after 5 years of being together we were finally allowed to legally marry. ( As of 1/01/2010 ) I am now an American Citizen who married a man from Vienna and now have all my legal rights and privileges just like any other married hetero couple in Europe. When I was getting my paperwork together for the marriage I had to get a notarized document from the U.S. Consulate in Vienna stating that I would be married to an Austrian Man and was not already married in the USA. So when I completed the paperwork they put the official seal of the US Gov. on it and sanctioned our marriage and gave us in so many words the blessing of the USA Gov.  They also asked what state we would be living in as husband and husband in the USA. I asked her what this meant and she said put down the state that you will be residing in the US as Husband and Husband in I put Florida. I have all the paper work from them and since they stated and validated and notarized the factthat I was not married in the USA and that I was to marry a same sex partner.  Isn’t that the US Government saying we acknowledge the fact that you have a GAY Legal marriage outside the USA but don’t try anything like this in the USA?

Manfred & Rob

We are having a special wedding service in Vienna on the 4th of September 2010 at 1:00.  We will have it in the heart of Wien and have friends from all over the world present for our small but very special marriage service. We would love to have you there to see us take our vows. Then afterwards have a small reception in the Keller of the Kapelle that was most likely a part of the underground network that the Austrians used when Vienna was being bombed in the war. Then the next day a second reception and celebration that will include being picked up at the house and driven through Vienna by a white horse drawn carriage to one of Vienna’s Famous landmarks the Wiener Riesenrad for a champagne toast and second very small and special second reception high above the city of lovers. Vienna

Now my problem is:
If heterosexuals from different countries can marry a US citizen and get a green card why can’t legally married retired same sex couples who get married in another country like us, do this legally in the USA? What further angers me is the fact that hetero couples do it all the time illegally to get green cards. We were even told that my Austrian partner should pay a US woman citizen to marry her just to get a green card in the USA. We paid good money and got this suggestion from several well known immigration lawyers in the USA. They literally told us to break the law to get a green card. We do not condone this and are glad we didn’t listen. Please help me understand this problem. WE would appreciate any suggestions and help you might have. All we want to do is live out the rest of our short lives in love and in the USA and maybe Wien if we can afford it. We don’t want to take any jobs away from anyone. Right now Manny my life partner ( Husband ) can only stay in the USA for 6 months. Then he has to travel back to Austria ( with or without me ) Other countries have a Retirement Visa why doesn’t the USA grow up and do the same thing?  Thanks so much for listening and any advice you might have.
Sincerely Rob and Manny   

RobManfred@GaySeniors.Info

Author: Rob Categories: LIFE, POLITICS

Selling Queer

September 18th, 2009

Featured

My Doc Coming to Dish

By Dekker ⋅ September 23, 2008 ⋅

sellingqMy documentary “Selling Queer” is coming to Dish Network this Winter. The film won Best Doc at the NY Independent Film Festival and was screened at Cannes before its limited theatrical run. The home video was originally produced via Ardustry Entertainment is no longer available. It had a nice full page write up in IFQ Magazine next to an interview with a personal favorite, Danny Boyle. The film focuses on Orlando’s Gay Days week and specifically asks the question that was on the mind of people paying attention in 2004… Are marketers selling an image of gay identity back to gay people now that they’ve realized the gay community has discretionary income?

Imdb told me it sucked! Really? You don’t say. Okay, I’ll admit it. I have a two star documentary on imdb. How does that make me feel? Wonderful. It tells me that a controversial documentary did its job. It also showcases a fatal flaw in imdb concerning small release films. I’m not going to say that my film is perfect by any stretch… but I will say that it’s no way a 2 star movie. It’s an award-winning documentary, and the first film made on the topic of the gay marketing boom of the early millennium. The film is called Selling Queer, and it obviously made an impact because The Washington Peace Center (a 50 year old anti-racism organization) snaked the name and presented a seminar series called “Selling Queerness / Queer Anti-Capitalism”. Of which I know attendees had seen and enjoyed my doc.

The 2 star rating is strange and represents issues with the way that imdb calculates its results. Essentially, you have a few groups of people who had seen the film at screenings and if they were offended they voted 1. If they thought it raised some good questions, they voted 10. IMDB stripped most of these votes out completely and vomitted up a 2. This seems to happen with titles that are controversial. You can see it trend in episodes of American Idol, The Daily Show, The Colbert Report, Howard Stern, A&E’s Biography and Charlie Rose. All have many episodes that rate 2 on the imdb scale. So, no, I’m not offended by a 2 when it comes to a doc. Besides, it had a limited theatrical run and it’s coming to Dish Network Pay-Per-View before the end of the year… so it’s still alive.

Why is it so offensive? I’m not sure. I can tell you that many of the people who spoke out in it were very sorry to have done so. I can also tell you that we were given a lot of access through a relationship with Chris Manley and his company Gay Days Inc. One of the big issues is that Chris wanted a PR piece and I started out filming something that was very complimentary, but I just didn’t have the heart to follow through when I heard these awful stories and discontentment. I had to show it like it was. Chris is an amazing person, he rescues dogs and supports many local Central Florida businesses. That doesn’t mean that I can give him a pass. It also doesn’t mean I can condemn him. I don’t do so in the doc. I just try to relay facts and show the events as they were.

One piece of the hatred puzzle is that Rob Labby, one of the main subjects of the film, is a serious Christian. As such he went on Christian radio and talked about the movie. This caused a lot of already on the fence viewers, and potential viewers, to think this was a smear piece made by a right-wing nut. It’s not. I’m very happy to have been able to work with the activists, theaters, distributors and festivals that I did. I’m very happy to have gotten the film finished as my first feature-length work and I’m very happy that it’s still being shown. Another one of the big points of contention with the film is that I’m not gay. In fact, I was married to my first wife when the film was in post a few years ago. This caused many offended people to assume that the film was a way of cashing in on their community. That’s also not true. All the profits go to charity.

It’s a comedy of errors, but check the film out on Dish Network this Winter and decide for yourself.

——————————————————————————————————–

Here is Rob’s side of the story

writen by Rob

I am one of the major players an instigator in the Documentary called Selling Queer. I just found out that the video that was made several years ago in Orlando that shows how the Gay community is being taken advantage of by its own was going to be on the dish network. I was also very surprised to find out that I am on the religious right side of the gay community and that the people in the Doc. we’re sorry that they were HONEST at the time, and said what they said.

All I wanted to do was to have an affordable family orientated event without alcohol and sexual overtones that was also a fund raising event for a struggling Gay Community. I asked around if there was anything like this going on during Gay Days. When I found out there wasn’t any I thought why not start it myself. My target group were those in the gay community that were older ( over 35 ) and those who were non drinking, or would like that option. I also figured that there was the ever growing family orientated part of the community that was being left out of the Disney Family? Gay Days sexual drunk fests get together. There was also a large group of guys and gals that could not afford the $100.00 – $200.00 – or even $300.00 ticket prices for this event that was supposed to be for everyone. In the beginning I brought the idea to our local gay church. They thought it was a good idea. So I started working on the project in conjunction with Joy Metropolitan Community Church in Orlando as a fund raiser for them. Well even they went over to the dark side. I am sad to say. When they found out what was going on they opted to go with the BIG BUCKS and forgot about the families, seniors, and non drinkers and those who could not afford the rediculas prices for the Balls and parties etc. that were taking place during the event.

Being a 64 year old retired gay man I as well as so many others who feel left out of this youth booze and money orientated event called Gay Days. I always was and always will be an advocate for the gay community and have not and will not make a penny out of this video or any of the projects I am or were a part of. In fact I lost a lot of money and a lot of faith in the gay community in Orlando Florida during the time Selling Queer was being made. Those that said they would and wanted to help me sabotaged me for their own gain. The Gay Days and Gay Day groups ( there were 2 different groups fighting for the top profit margin.) neither was or is a not for profit group. Neither of the groups would ever say how much money they actually made on Gay Days. That way it would look like giving the community a few hundred dollars was a real generous thing. But when you think of the Millions of dollars that were filtered through the Gay Days and Gay Day organizations, what they gave back to the community was little to nothing. What they got out of the community was far more than they put back. I still believe that sex sells more so than family values in the Gay Community. If this makes me a religious right wing nut then so be it. Even Disney bought into the Gay scene under the guise of helping the Gay Community. Let’s face it if every one that was gay left Disney tomorrow they would have to close the doors. They find and hire Queens that can’t work anywhere else to work for them for pennies on the dollar. They exploit the Gay Community in so many ways. This is one of their more noticeable ones. Why would they let Homosexuals kiss and make out and dress in inappropriate clothes and use foul language in their Family only park if it wasn’t to make a buck. I am far from a prude believe me. But everything has its place. Disney even had signs in the parks stating during Gay Days stating if you don’t want to be offended to come back another day. Well to be honest I am offended very offended the way the Gay community is exploiting its self.

My partner and I have a Totally Free web site for the forgotten older Gay men in the Gay Community. We say it’s a site for Seniors and those who someday will become Seniors. http://gayseniors.info We are retired and make no profit out of the site. It is not a business but an avocation and labor of love. We have thousands and thousands of free registered members, worldwide. The very positive response we get is really rewarding. Guys who would be laughed at and snubbed if they went to Gay Days have a Totally Free place to meet and interact and find out there is a place for the so called over the hill gay male ( over 30 ) I am and always will be an advocate for the forgotten Gay male. I was one. I only hope you offer your hand to an older gay, man some time. Remember as we say on the site “Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, and today is a gift: That’s why we call it the present.  You judge for yourself.

By the way I never received a copy of the complete video from the production company. I have one of the first copies and I know it’s been changed since its conception. After all it is on the DISH NETWORK not on Logo. Logo will put on shows like Queer as Folk a series that has its place but won’t admit that there are a growing contingent of senior gay men looking for validation and not feeling their too old or fat or infirmed to be a active part of the Gay Community. Were here were Gay ( not Queer ) and some day God willing you to will be one of us ( A Senior Citizen ) As I grow older I don’t get more cynical I just recognize stupidity easier. Has this type of discrimination or theft and hit in your life let us know if you or someone you know did see or have this happen. We would love to let others know about it so it might save them some trouble and pain. Thanks so much

RobManfred@gayseniors.info

Thanks for your interest.

Sincerely Rob Labby

Author: Rob Categories: LIFE, POLITICS

Letter from The President of The USA

June 8th, 2009

by  Barack Obama, President of the United States of America

Forty years ago, patrons and supporters of the Stonewall Inn in New York City resisted police harassment that had become all too common for members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) community.
Out of this resistance, the LGBT rights movement in America was born. During LGBT Pride Month, we commemorate the events of June 1969 and commit to achieving equal justice under law for LGBT Americans.

President Obama with his grandparents
President Obama with his grandparents

LGBT Americans have made, and continue to make, great and lasting contributions that continue to strengthen the fabric of American society. There are many well-respected LGBT leaders in all professional fields, including the arts and business communities. LGBT Americans also mobilised the Nation to respond to the domestic HIV/AIDS epidemic and have played a vital role in broadening this country’s response to the HIV pandemic.
Due in no small part to the determination and dedication of the LGBT rights movement, more LGBT Americans are living their lives openly today than ever before. I am proud to be the first President to appoint openly LGBT candidates to Senate-confirmed positions in the first 100 days of an Administration. These individuals embody the best qualities we seek in public servants, and across my Administration – in both the White House and the Federal agencies –openly LGBT employees are doing their jobs with distinction and professionalism.
The LGBT rights movement has achieved great progress, but there is more work to be done. LGBT youth should feel safe to learn without the fear of harassment, and LGBT families and seniors should be allowed to live their lives with dignity and respect.
My Administration has partnered with the LGBT community to advance a wide range of initiatives. At the international level, I have joined efforts at the United Nations to decriminalize homosexuality around the world. Here at home, I continue to support measures to bring the full spectrum of equal rights to LGBT Americans. These measures include enhancing hate crimes laws, supporting civil unions and Federal rights for LGBT couples, outlawing discrimination in the workplace, ensuring adoption rights, and ending the existing “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy in a way that strengthens our Armed Forces and our national security. We must also commit ourselves to fighting the HIV/AIDS epidemic by both reducing the number of HIV infections and providing care and support services to people living with HIV/AIDS across the United States.
These issues affect not only the LGBT community, but also our entire Nation. As long as the promise of equality for all remains unfulfilled, all Americans are affected. If we can work together to advance the principles upon which our Nation was founded, every American will benefit. During LGBT Pride Month, I call upon the LGBT community, the Congress, and the American people to work together to promote equal rights for all, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim June 2009 as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride Month. I call upon the people of the United States to turn back discrimination and prejudice everywhere it exists.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this first day of June, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third.
BARACK OBAMA

Author: Manfred Categories: INFOS, POLITICS

The Truth about Ted Haggard

February 10th, 2009

G. Youngman, MBA, MPH: Consultant, Nanaimo, BC

haggardYou might remember Ted Haggard, a former evangelical preacher who last year was outed as having homosexual sex with a male prostitute. He entered treatment and was discharged saying he was “completely heterosexual”. News about his has resurfaced as his new documentary is currently airing repeatedly on HBO – “The trials of Ted Haggard.”

In his interviews, he states that he believes his sexuality is “complicated” and that he wants to stay married to his wife and does not see himself as gay. He admits to having same-sex attractions but believes he is heterosexual.

Nobody knows the truth about Haggard but Haggard himself!

I don’t know Haggard personally, but I can see how his sexuality might be complicated and that he might not be gay at all .Hundreds of men like Haggard who are not gay and engage in same sex behaviors.
People have a hard time with men who have sex with men and are still
heterosexual.
Why?

Here are just a few reasons people have difficulty with Ted Haggard which I totally understand:

1. Politically

Using the false belief that gays can change stops people from being willing to grant rights and freedoms to gays and lesbians. Lesbians and gays have fought hard to teach that one’s sexual orientation and behaviors cannot be changed.

Politically laws against GLBT use the concept of “you’re making a choice” to block obtaining freedoms like getting legally married, keeping a job and not being a risk of being fired just because you’re gay as well as keeping your house and not being kicked out simply for being gay-all of which can happen still in 2009 in most places around the country.

My problem with all of this media attention around Haggard is the absence of scholarly lesbians and gays and spokesmen who are not given time to talk about these issues. If this were an African-American issue, the media would bring on Black scholars and writers to address the political consequences of what is happening around Haggard’s story.

2. The Bible.

Haggard has a history of as a preacher, for condemning gays and urging them to change.

Haggard still feels the Bible is not okay with homosexuality as he said on Larry King live.

But Haggard and others who interpret the Bible about homosexuality are wrong.

Scholar Rabbi Chaim Rapoport wrote a book called, Judaism and Homosexuality: An Authentic Orthodox View. In this book it is written that, “the Torah forbids homosexual activity as such: that much is clear from the testimony of both biblical and post-biblical literature. It does not condemn a homosexual disposition, because the Torah does not speak about what we are, but about what we do”.

Rabbi Rapoport position is clear in his book that the bible only talks of homosexual behavior, not of a gay identity or homosexual disposition. It never addresses those men and women who are oriented solely to a same sex attraction. He argues that while the Bible is against performing homosexual acts it never takes into account that one could be gay and lesbian and therefore expressing their true nature. Given this the Bible, from a contemporary point of view, does not address lesbians and gays.

While Rabbi Rapoport writes that the Torah forbids homosexual activity, he goes onto say that “there does not seem to be, however, any reference in Torah literature to the phenomenon of a ‘homosexual orientation’….”

Given this one cannot use the bible against homosexuality if there was not any room for it to be an identity which, today, we know it is.

For Haggard and men like him, it may not be his identity and so for him, his interpretation of the Bible might be useful. It is not useful for those who are GLBT’s.

3. Bisexuality

Why can’t Bisexuality be what is happening for Haggard? Some men like Haggard choose to self-identify as Bisexual because they are sexually attracted to both men and women. Bisexuals will tell you that they are often emotionally more attracted to one gender over another. For others they are equally attracted sexually and romantically to both.

This is a self-identifying term and if he chooses not to label himself in this way then he has that right. However, as a media figure he has the obligation to ensure that he is not speaking for bisexuals as well as lesbians and gays.

4. Gay Identity

For lesbians and gays, staying closeted was fraught with lying to themselves that they were essentially straight, with simply a “kinky” side or that their sexual interests were just that-sexual-and not about their identity. They now have great remorse over the lost years when they could have lived as openly gay men. The trauma of staying closeted was so painful that it strikes a nerve to learn that it’s possible to go through all that and still be straight.

I understand their strong reactions: The trauma of suppressing their identity is so profound that watching someone like Haggard remind them of their horrors they experienced while being closeted and of all the deprogramming it took them to understand they were truly gay.

We must make room for men and women like Haggard. Whether he is hiding, lying or telling the truth, there needs to be a place for men like him

What there is no place for is his anti-gay rhetoric that lesbians and gays can change, that the bible is against homosexuality and teaching young gays and lesbians that same-sex attractions are bad and wrong. They might be for the Haggard’s of the world, but to those who are truly gay and lesbian they are not!

Haggard’s story need not be about attacking him, attacking GLBT’s or using this as reasons to hate, discriminate and judge. That is what the Nazi’s were all about wasn’t it?

This needs to be about understanding and being curious about how complicated sexual behavior and identity can be!

Author: aesgay Categories: POLITICS

The Business of Giving

January 25th, 2009

By G. Youngman, Consultant, Nanaimo, BC

Appended below are my thoughts on the annual World Economic gathering in Davos, Switzerland. This year the meetings took on a very sombre tone as the world faces the worst economic meltdown in many years. People like those suffering from AIDS, other diseases in the developing world as well the poor and homeless in the developed countries have become the innocent victims of the greed of the western capitalists.

Exploring philanthropy, non-profits and socially motivated business, from the Gates Foundation to your donation. A fresh look at the economy of good intentions.

From Davos: U.S. funds executive bonuses but breaks health promises

While U.S. bailout funds will help pay $18 billion in holiday bonuses for Wall Street executives, the U.S. has broken its promise to fund a global health program that saves millions of lives.
That was the scathing assessment of Jeffrey Sachs, director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University and special adviser to the U.N. Secretary General, speaking on a conference call this morning.
The economic crisis has resulted in a $5 billion funding gap for the Global Fund because countries, led by the U.S., are falling short on their pledges, Sachs and others said.

The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB & Malaria is the main source of finance for programs to prevent and treat the three diseases. The fund gathers money from donor countries and provides a quarter of all international financing for AIDS, two-thirds for tuberculosis and three quarters for malaria.

“I would suggest the U.S. reclaim those bonuses, which are absolutely unjustified and completely unconscionable, and put the money in the Global Fund immediately,” Sachs said.

The $5 billion shortfall is less than one-half of one percent of what G8 countries have approved to bail out failing banks in the last three months, he added. The Merrill Lynch bonuses alone would be enough to close the gap in U.S. contributions, Sachs said.

The Fund projects it will need $8 billion to continue its work in 2009 and 2010, yet current pledges total only $3 billion. The U.S. and other donor countries pledged to support all valid Global Fund programs by committing about 0.7 of 1% of GNP in aid.

Despite a 2002 pledge made by the Bush Administration to honor that commitment, “the United States is not only not on track; it’s fallen back to become the donor with the smallest donation as a share of income of all the rich countries,” said Sachs. “We’re at 0.16 of 1% of our income for development assistance. It’s the lowest level of all 22 donor countries.”

As a result, the Fund is delaying programs and cutting costs, and using this week’s World Economic Forum to call attention to the issue.

The world shouldn’t squander progress on major diseases for short term gains, said Peter Chernin, president of News Corp. and chairman of Malaria No More.
Goals include guaranteeing global access to antiretroviral drugs for HIV by 2010 and reducing malaria deaths to near zero by 2012.

Malaria control is an example of a good return on investment, Chernin said.

Programs are showing real results such as a 66 percent drop in malaria-related deaths in Rwanda in one year following increased use of bednets to prevent bites and treatment with effective medicine.

“In today’s uncertain marketplace,” Chernin said, the Global Fund “delivers proven results in both economic and humanitarian terms.” Malaria alone costs Africa $12 billion a year in lost productivity, he noted.
Chernin said he’s working to boost donations to the fund from the private sector.

Chevron was the first private company to step up, with a $30 million donation, said Rajat Gupta, a McKinsey senior partner who chairs the Global Fund. The (Product) Red project has raised about $150 million.
Tomorrow, Chernin will join with Exxon Mobil and Standard Charter Bank to launch a campaign to raise $100 million from private companies, primarily for malaria programs funded through the Global Fund. The campaign will also ask companies to provide technical and business assistance, such as logistics for bed net delivery and marketing efforts to increase the use of bed nets.

 

Kenya: Healthcare Threatened By Political Crisis
________________________________________
Health officials are concerned about the long-term impact of Kenya’s political crisis on healthcare, especially in areas hardest hit by violence since the end of December 2007.
“The most worrying issue is that of drug resistance among patients of chronic diseases,” Ian van Engelgem, the medical coordinator of Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), stated.
He said HIV and Tuberculosis (TB) patients who had missed out on their regular medication for up to a month due to displacement and violence could develop resistance to the drugs.
“Right now a lot of HIV patients are on first-line drugs; they could require second-line drugs, which are more expensive, if they develop resistance as a result of skipping their ARV [anti-retroviral] medication for a period of time,” Van Engelgem said.
The fact that internally displaced persons (IDPs) have better access to healthcare compared with the host community where the camps are located is another concern.
“If IDPs have access to free healthcare, the same should also apply to them [host communities] as they are equally affected by the unrest,” Van Engelgem said.
Displaced health workers
Joanne Greenfield, malaria adviser for the UN World Health Organization (WHO) in Nairobi, said displacement and ongoing violence in parts of the country could lead to a crisis in the provision of healthcare in the affected regions.
“The security situation, especially in the Rift Valley [Province], is affecting the provision of health services to the general public as a significant number of health workers are either displaced and/or cannot report to their duty stations,” Greenfield said.
WHO, the lead agency for the health cluster of humanitarian actors – comprising UN agencies, NGOs and government organisations – has also expressed concern over the health of thousands of IDPs, mostly women and children, in the Rift Valley.
On 1 February, newspaper reports indicated that chicken pox and diarrhoea had broken out in two IDP camps in Naivasha, a town in Rift Valley Province, which has been severely affected by the violence.
“The number of sites hosting IDPs appears to increase by the day,” the agency said in a statement. “Initial WHO assessment has found that these sites are very crowded, with poor shelter, water supply, sanitation (in some camps, toilet to person ratio is 1 for 500), food shortages, no cooking fuel, precarious access to healthcare and shortages of antibiotics, children’s medicines, malaria medicines and life-saving drugs for chronic illness. Nearby hospitals are also facing similar shortages of drugs and supplies.”
Sexual violence
In a worrying development, WHO said, hospitals in the region had reported dramatic increases in cases of sexual violence. The agency said counselling services in most IDP sites were not available, including for reproductive health, sexual violence or HIV/AIDS.
“In many settings, survivors have no access to even the minimum health and psychological support, leaving them vulnerable to a range of potential negative health problems, including HIV/AIDS,” WHO stated.
George Mugenya, the medical superintendent of health at the Rift Valley General Provincial Hospital in Nakuru, said services were slowly returning to normal but the displacement remained a key concern.
“When the violence was intense, we put elective cases on hold to handle only emergency cases; now that it is calmer, we are noticing that some services are still affected because of the displacement of some of the medical staff,” he said. “Some workers have not reported to duty while others come irregularly and this has affected services such as those offered in the maternity section but, overall, things are returning to normal.”
He said the challenge was in re-stocking the hospital’s medical supplies and reviving clinic services for patients of chronic diseases.
Teams led by WHO officials visited the towns of Eldoret and Nakuru to coordinate the health cluster activities. The teams visited IDP camps and hospitals to monitor disease outbreaks as well as the availability of medical supplies and health workers.
According to WHO, the biggest worry at all sites was diarrhoea in children as well as acute respiratory infections. It was also concerned about irregular access to malaria, HIV/AIDS and TB medicines, while patients with asthma, hypertension and diabetes also lacked access.
Kenya’s Ministry of Health, together with WHO, the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF), the Kenya Red Cross Society and other health NGOs, undertook a joint health assessment on 30 January of Uasin Gishu district in the Rift Valley, which is hosting 150,000 IDPs in 11 camps.
As a result, the medical officer reported that a mass immunisation against measles and polio, as well as the de-worming of children and provision of Vitamin A supplements, would begin in February.
The health officials also discussed the possibility of introducing mobile services for areas where normal services had been disrupted.

 

Global health gains at risk from economic crisis

Worried that the worldwide economic crisis may roll back gains made in battling diseases in the world’s poorest countries, global health advocates are calling on the richest countries not to renege on their funding pledges to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.
One well-known advocate even called on the U.S. government to take back the $18 billion in bonuses that Wall Street bankers paid themselves while receiving taxpayer bailout money, and use the money instead on HIV drugs and mosquito nets.
Calling the bonuses “unbelievably egregious,” Jeffrey Sachs, director of Columbia University’s Earth Institute said:
“Those bonuses are being paid out of our bailout funds… I suggest the U.S. government reclaim that funding and put the money into the Global Fund immediately.”
The public-private Global Fund was created in 2002 to collect and disburse money from governments and foundations to fight the three diseases. It prides itself on squeezing the most out of every dollar and pushes countries submitting requests for funds to develop innovative and cost-effective proposals.
Programs it has funded have resulted in a 66% drop in malaria deaths in Rwanda in a single year, and an 80% drop in malaria deaths in Eritrea over five years.
Now, the group said, it has more good proposals than it can fund, and faces a $5 billion shortfall over the next two years if rich countries don’t pony up.
In a teleconference call from Davos, Switzerland, where world economic leaders are meeting to discuss the money mess, Global Fund Chairman Rajat Gupta said:
“All is not doom and gloom. We have tremendous successes to celebrate in global health, although we have a long way to go.”
Also at Davos, another global health group — the Global Network for Neglected Tropical Diseases announced a stepped-up effort to combat a baker’s dozen of parasitic and bacterial diseases that affect the poorest of the world’s poor.
The diseases include Chagas disease, leishmaniasis and leprosy. Some are found even in the United States.
The campaign received a $34 million grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, but it is also calling on regular folks to pitch in, pointing out that many of these neglected diseases can be treated for as little as 50 cents a day a year.
More than 1 billion people are infected with neglected tropical diseases. The Wall Street bonuses alone would have paid for 36 days a year of treatment for every single one of them, with $17.5 billion to spare.

Author: aesgay Categories: POLITICS

Might just be the smartest thing Bush ever did

January 6th, 2009

G. Youngman, Nanaimo, BC

Before leaving office, President George W. Bush will pardon himself from the verdict of history.
Sources say History is pissed. “We had an open-and-shut case on this guy,” one historical judge reportedly McCaine seducing Bush :-)fumed. “We had him nailed.”
Insiders confirm that the outgoing president will grant himself a full and formal reprieve from the court of public opinion. Such a pardon has the full force of law, and would apply to any judgments now pending or yet to be made by future judges of history.
Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution grants presidents the right to issue full pardons to anyone, regardless of crime. Controversial benefactors of presidential largesse have included Marc Rich, the fugitive financier pardoned by President Clinton on his final day in office; and Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger, pardoned by President Herbert Walker Bush in 1992 for his role on the Iran-Contra scandal.
Constitutional scholars say that President Gerald Ford’s 1974 pardon of ex-president Richard Nixon comes closest to setting a precedent for the action about to be taken by the current president. Still, no previous president has ever pardoned himself. As well, previous pardons pertained only to potential or existing criminal cases. President Bush’s self-pardon would apply to the murkier realm commonly referred to as the “Judgment of Time.”
Blanket protection
Experts believe that Bush’s pardon would extend to opinion shapers in both the journalistic and academic realms. Retrospectives of the Bush presidency, already well underway in preparation for his January departure, will now likely be severely curtailed. Assessments of the Iraq war, torture scandals, constitutional crimes, the economic crisis and even political missteps like the “bring ‘em on” and “mission accomplished” fiascos will now be replaced by simpler observations, such as: “He was the 43rd president of the United States,” “He enjoyed an occasional hot dog and a ball game” and “He was right handed.”
“We’re not happy, of course,” another historian offered. “The evidence was pretty clear, and the verdict was going to be a slam dunk. But we’re pretty much hamstrung here.”
Some indirect criticisms might still be available, such as, “The president’s brother, Jeb, has a funny name,” or “Between 1989 and 1998, Bush was part-owner of the Texas Rangers baseball team, which continued to suck the hind tit during this period.” Still, fear of protracted legal action may put a chill on even these veiled attacks.
One hope remains, however. “There are a lot of amateur historians out there,” one academic offered. “Does this pardon apply to them as well? We’re in uncharted territory here. A constitutional pardon can shut me up. But it can’t stop Joe Six-Pack from making a few choice remarks to his drinking buddies.”
Others disagree. “I think that’s covered too,” said one expert.

Author: aesgay Categories: POLITICS